Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative

Oxford Department of International Development

Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford

History of the MPI

What does it mean to live in poverty? This question has often been answered by lack of income, but the traditional narrow focus on income as the only measure of a person’s wellbeing, or lack of it, is being increasingly challenged. Recent high profile initiatives, such as the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission, have called for broader measures that take account of other vitally important aspects of life.

These initiatives are not alone in this thinking. The human development approach has long argued that although income is important, it has limitations that call for more direct measures. The 1997 United Nations Development Programme’s flagship Human Development Report (UNDP HDR) introduced the Human Poverty Index (HPI), which measured multiple deprivations in key aspects of human development. UNDP researchers concluded that the HPI had limited utility because it aggregated average deprivation levels for each dimension and thus could not be linked to any specific group of people.

In its 20th anniversary year, the UNDP Human Development Report (UNDP HDR) decided to introduce a new international measure of poverty – the Multidimensional Poverty Index or MPI – which directly measures the combination of deprivations that each household experiences. The MPI uses microeconomic data to reflect the percentage of households that experience overlapping deprivations in three dimensions—education, health and living conditions.

The new MPI was developed and applied by OPHI with UNDP support and supplants the HPI. Sabina Alkire and Maria Emma Santos designed the MPI using a technique for multidimensional measurement created by Sabina Alkire and James Foster. In 2010, OPHI analysed poverty across 78% of the world’s people in 104 developing countries using the MPI and released the results in advance of the 2010 HDR. Forty-six researchers in 13 countries in both the developed and developing world worked on the project. The 2011 MPI took this total to 109 countries.

From their inception, the UNDP HDRs have pioneered new ways to analyse human development and poverty, intended to have a direct impact on development strategy and methodology. By featuring this independently conceived new approach to poverty measurement in the 20th anniversary report, UNDP HDR hopes to encourage its use in the field by governments, development agencies, and other institutions dedicated to the eradication of poverty.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
 |  Trackback

Join OPHI Mailing List

Email address:     

Latest

At Davos, why is no one talking about the poor? TIME magazine article on how the perspective of the poor is missing from the World Economic Forum discussions Read more

New paper on measurement errors and multidimensional poverty New OPHI Working Paper by Cesar Calvo and Fernando Fernandez, Universidad de Piura, Peru, looks at measurement errors in multidimensional poverty estimates. Read more

Paper on measuring corruption forthcoming in World Bank Economic Review "An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Corruption: Theory and Applications" (OPHI Working Paper 29) by James Foster, Andrew W. Horowitz and Fabio Méndez is to be published in leading economic journal. Read more

Article by Sabina Alkire published by AFD and EUDN A new volume 'Measure for Measure: How Well Do We Measure Development?' features an article by OPHI's Director entitled ‘Multidimensional Poverty and its Discontents’. Read more

Latest Publications

Measurement Errors and Multidimensional Poverty Data measurement errors can cause an upward bias in unidimensional poverty estimates and thus mislead both conceptual and empirical discussions. This paper expands the analysis to the case of multidimensional poverty. It finds that the dual cut-off strategy used by the Alkire-Foster measure typically attenuates this bias. Empirical evidence from Peru supports this attenuation effect. Read more

On the Possibility of Measuring Freedom: A Kantian Perspective More than three decades after Sen's first formulation of the so-called "capability approach", practitioners have yet to measure a capability set. This paper explores the valuable insights Kantian philosophy may offer in dealing with this problem. Read more

Events

Highlighted Events

The Gross National Happiness Index of Bhutan on 06 Feb 2012, 13:00

Measurement Error in the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) on 27 Feb 2012, 13:00